|
Dagmar Travner
|
||
|
Shades / Shapes – Scratches in Light
Concerning
the 30 Jears Jubilee Exhibition „Light & Shade“ of the Gallery arcade |
||
|
Trop
de lumière éblouit |
||
|
At the beginnings of fine art we find a story passed on by Pliny: the potter Butades’ daughter faithfully traced the outline of her sleeping lover’s shadow, cast on the wall by the light of a lamp. As he then fell in battle her father bestowed the shadowy outline with a clay body – thus the first sculpture was created from the ε̉ίδωλον, illusion, silhouette, likeness. A form steps forth from the wall – the shadow is sketched by the artist with deft strokes. Can a picture, an image ever catch the original form, hold it captive? The form disappears behind the image, can never completely reflect the object of artistic desire. The picture will always remain a shadowy projection, never attaining the status of the original. And this shadow-entity exists only as a delusion, stays captive in the underworld. |
||
|
Shadow Worlds |
|
|
|
Regina Hadraba draws her own
personal silhouette from the wall, the Corner, before her, painting
upright and erect. In the meantime a figure cowers, on the back of her both
sides painted work, not yet unfolded, not developed – in embryonic posture.
In Plato’s myth of the cave, shadows are
symbolised as being perceived images of unrecognisable archetypes or ideas.
What might these look like, if we are only aware of their shadows and seek
to retain these in our inadequate images? And even if we succeed in freeing
ourselves from our bonds, in turning away from the wall of shadows and
looking outwards beyond the glare, out of the cavern, towards the sun, we
will initially be unable to perceive anything except diffuse phantoms in
radiant light. The glistening light produces no immediate new knowledge,
quite the opposite: it blinds. In the first instance one sees less than was
perceived from the shadowy forms. Slowly, step by step, we learn to see anew
– can one ever go back? To conclude the link from the silhouette to the
archetype? The perceived image is merely a shadow.
Karl Grabner takes up this ambiguity between archetype and image as
the theme of his endeavours. A sequence of pictorial images reaches out from
the chaos of incomplete strokes, colours, surfaces, shadows, searching for
the archetype to give form to the concept. Andrea
Schnell draws on the idea of an other artist, the picture of a Rodin
sculpture, and invites the observer to search for the resulting new
realisation in overlayered strokes, in hidden shadows. |
||
|
Shadow-light |
|
|
|
Small hands become dangerous crocodiles or frightened rabbits. Can one
catch one’s own shadow, can one lose it, how can we double it? When
children play with their shadows, they jump and grab, they shape and
shelter. Chasing shadows. Creating something new through finger dexterity,
shadow games, shadow theatre. Manipulated silhouettes on a movable screen.
Again archetypes – of the theatre. Kerstin Cmelka
revives the art of the shadow theatre with still photographs in old frames. |
||
|
The projection looks at me and I want to close it’s eyes. It should not look at me, with it’s outsize eyes, this projection, which has been thrown onto me, it should not catch sight of me in my smock... |
|
|
|
Petra Buchegger, seen from
behind, tries to shut the eyes of the model with her index fingers, and
thereby thematize seeing and being seen. Innumerable gazes are directed at
the subject; the world consists of alien gazes, marks on the surface of the
picture, and everybody is completely alone with his own pair of eyes. The
image results from photographing the superimposing of slide projection on
the object; light and the fall of shadow from the projection, light itself
exists as an image – the continuation of the Myth of the Cave. Which “reality”,
which cognisance is behind this many layered image? For
Brigitte Pamperl the representation of to-day’s
world is redefined in barcodes; in her work Light + Barcodes = 128,
the visitors become a constituent part of the silhouette, a projection upon
a barcode, through the medium of a surveillance camera. We encounter light
as a metaphor of knowledge, with the vulnerable, organically weaving
Tendril (Ranke) from Elisabeth Weissensteiner.
A body of light from handmade paper, which makes light visible in all it’s
facets, through transparency and opaqueness with fine ramificated structures.
The polarity of the metaphorical light and shade is articulated by means of
a rusty wire mesh attached to the climbing tendril. |
||
|
Shadow Domains |
|
|
|
Waltraud Palme’s silhouette-like photographic work contains a light and shade polarisation per se. The photograms colour the light on the paper black, while the depicted object leaves a bright silhouette, rich in shadows, partially transparent outlines. Erich Steininger’s preoccupation with light and shade originates from the fundamental nature of the wood cut as a medium. The graphic representation of the dusky structures are intensified and resolved into pure Schattenfelder (Shadow Domains). He produces a “blackening” effect by printing in layers with several plates, one on top of the other: predominant, the shadows devour the light until only the faintest points of light are left visible in the black regions. In this moment the nocturnal motive retreats into the background, while the solitary spots of light assume form. Georg Lebzelter takes a different approach. In the first etchings, from the cycle Schlachten (Slaughter), cattle carcasses mutate with increasing darkness into an unyielding hill landscape. Valleys and gorges are generated, slopes, crevices, ravines, mountain streams. With water, light returns into the pictures through reflections, through the play of light. The further development evolving from this stands somewhat in contrast. In the series Lichten (Clearing), a light horizon gradually transforms into bright visions in the sky, over a wide desert. “Earth juts through the world... only so far as truth happens, as the primal conflict between clearing and concealing.” Heidegger’s quotation, concerning the concealment and the setting-forth of light as a metaphor for truth and cognisance, could well be seen as the caption for these etchings. The graphic artist Henriette Leinfellner works with imaginary maps, shows new manifestations of the Earth. The shadow of a cloud spreads itself over the landscape. The sun is shaded off. The earth-shadow is nevertheless swifter, it catches up with the cloud shadow and swallows it. The light conditions change themselves in Lothar Bruckmeier’s painting Landschaft mit Wolke (Landscape with Cloud) just as the patches of sunlight in the clouded sky race over the countryside, whereas, in Alfred Bachlehner’s seascape, dark fish surround – or worship? – a bright sun-lemon. So here we sit, in the shadows of an Italian pergola and look forward to fresh sardines in lemon sauce. Time flows over the landscape, fleet cloud shadows drift by, above us. Already the shadows are becoming elongated. In the south the dusk will rapidly change to night, whereas in our latitude (Mödling) the shadow threshold revolves more slowly over the earth – with 1116 km/h; Gerlinde Thuma takes the shadow of the night itself as a motive for her diptychs and shows its movement through juxtapositioned half-pictures. The shadow on the horizon of the day-night boundary. The vertical formulation depicts the function of the shadow in time. Or, seen from outer space, it could be considered as the shadow running over it’s expiry date. The transition from light to shade is sketched with deft strokes. The metaphorical interpretation of the concept of time in the fluent language of light and shade, day and night – pure polarity. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Translated by Jim Morrison
(published
by the Kunstverein arcade, |
||